Overview and Key Takeaways:
The recent birth of genetically edited twin girls in China has sparked controversy and raised concerns about the potential impact of manipulating genes for intelligence and cognition. The twins, Lulu and Nana, were born with altered genes using CRISPR technology in an attempt to make them immune to HIV. However, new research suggests that this alteration may not only enhance their immune systems but also have implications for brain function and academic performance.
Possible Effects on the Education Sector:
The experiment has been met with widespread condemnation for its lack of ethical consideration and irresponsible use of technology. However, it also brings to light the potential for manipulating genes for cognitive enhancement in the education sector. The deletion of the CCR5 gene, which has been linked to improved memory and brain recovery after stroke, could have far-reaching implications for education, particularly in terms of strategic partnerships and digitalization.
Impact on Further Education:
The potential impact on further education is significant, as it could enhance the learning abilities and cognitive skills of students, leading to greater academic success and potentially creating a competitive edge in the job market.
Influence on Higher Education:
The implications for higher education are also noteworthy, as it could potentially attract top-performing students and further enhance their abilities. However, there are also ethical considerations and concerns about creating a divide between those who have access to such technology and those who do not.
Considerations for Micro-credentials:
The use of CRISPR technology for cognitive enhancement could also have implications for micro-credentials, as it could potentially lead to the creation of specialized courses for students with altered genes. This could raise issues around equity and fairness in education.
Potential Applications in the Education Sector:
The potential applications of CRISPR technology and gene editing in education are numerous. It could be used for targeted interventions for students with learning difficulties, enhancing their cognitive abilities and improving their academic performance. Additionally, digital tools and AI can be utilized to personalize and tailor educational experiences for students with altered genes, creating a more efficient and effective learning environment.
Criticism and Potential Drawbacks:
The experiment has faced widespread criticism for its lack of ethical consideration and potential long-term consequences. There are concerns about creating a society where intelligence is artificially enhanced, leading to a divide between those who have access to such technology and those who do not. Additionally, there are cultural and ethical considerations, as not all societies may accept or condone such alterations.
Real-world examples, such as the use of digital tools and AI in education in China, highlight how these technologies can have negative impacts on students’ mental health and well-being. This raises concerns about the potential negative effects of manipulating genes for cognitive enhancement in education.
Recommendations for Action:
While the potential for using CRISPR technology and gene editing in education is significant, it is crucial to proceed with caution and consideration for the ethical implications. Educators and policymakers must work together to develop policies and guidelines for the responsible use of such technology in education. Additionally, further research and collaboration between scientists, educators, and policymakers can help identify practical ways to implement and explore these technologies in current or future projects. It is essential for international education leadership to stay updated and informed about these developments and consider the potential implications and applications for global education systems.
Source article: https://mittr-frontend-prod.herokuapp.com/s/612997/the-crispr-twins-had-their-brains-altered/