EdTech Insight – Why so many bad bosses still rise to the top

by | May 1, 2024 | McKinsey, News & Insights

Executive Summary and Main Points

Recent discussions on leadership within higher education highlight a significant discrepancy between confidence and competence in ascending leaders. Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic’s research sheds light on an important trend—the rise of often incompetent men to leadership roles—and the overlooked potential of candidates with traits like empathy, self-awareness, integrity, and humility. The discussion turns to emotional intelligence (EQ) as a key attribute for effective leadership and considers the impact of advancements in AI on leader selection processes, emphasizing the importance of soft skills and a deep understanding of human nature.

Potential Impact in the Education Sector

The revelations from this research could revolutionize Further Education and Higher Education selection processes, potentially leading to strategic rethinking of leadership roles beyond mere qualifications. In the realm of Micro-credentials, this could encourage a refocus on interpersonal skills such as empathy and humility. The incorporation of AI tools in candidate assessments could mitigate historic biases and enhance diversity, challenging the existing meritocratic systems by identifying intrinsic potential over traditional markers of success.

Potential Applicability in the Education Sector

Innovative applications of AI in education could include creating algorithms that assess candidates for leadership roles based on proven traits of effective leaders, such as high EQ, self-awareness, and humility. Digital tools and AI can provide data-driven insights, eschewing historical biases fraught in human judgment, thus refining the leader selection process globally. This could inform international education systems, creating more inclusive and effective educational leadership models.

Criticism and Potential Shortfalls

A critical analysis of the research might underline the risk of overly relying on AI, which could replicate existing biases if not carefully monitored with unbiased datasets. Moreover, this approach may face pushback in various cultural contexts where traditional leadership qualities are valued. The inclination towards charismatic personalities could overshadow the less glamorous but more effective EQ-centric leadership. Potential pitfalls also entail ethical questions around privacy and AI’s role in assessing human qualities.

Actionable Recommendations

To implement these insights, international education leadership should consider integrating robust, evidence-based AI tools for leader selection, paired with training programs that enhance EQ among aspiring leaders. A greater emphasis on soft skills within education systems, coupled with a shift from credential-centric to potential-centric leadership nominations, can cultivate more effective leaders. Adopting transparent data collection and analysis practices aligns with meritocratic values and facilitates diverse, competent leadership development.

Source article: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/why-so-many-bad-bosses-still-rise-to-the-top